Why can’t we be friends?

Lot long ago, natural scientists saw social theory critics as dangerous subversives, undermining science authority. The armistice was first settled in the UK. Social scientists were invited to cooperate with government and big science to engage a suspicious public. The exemplar was Labour’s risky GM Nation Debate.

The cooperative seems productive. At Harvard, Sheila Jasanoff set up a Science and Democracy Network, to examine the dialogue between experts and publics. The first academic output is Designs on Nature. But the impact of the effort is best assessed by scientists’ willingness to replace the words “truth” and “objectivity” with such social mush as “trust,” “persuasion” and “morality.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s